While Jared Taylor certainly possesses his own biases concerning both individuals and societies (in favor of western Anglo-Caucasians and the civilizations they have created), he has NEVER asserted the supremacy of this racial/ethnic group in any of his writings, and I would ask you to provide even a single piece of evidence to back this claim. "If Taylor wrote that because Jews and Asians are more intelligent they should therefore be in control, then he certainly would not be a white supremacist." Since when is that the definition or litmus test for who is and is not a white supremacist? If you look at the etymology or construction of the phrase "white supremacist", I think that it is both rather clear (not to mention redundant) to glean that it is one who advocates the SUPREMACY of whites.
That is some extremely fallacious logic you are using there my friend. Will Beback 22:22, 9 February 2006 (UTC) Reply If Taylor wrote that because Jews and Asians are more intelligent they should therefore be in control, then he certainly would not be a white supremacist. But none of that rules out white supremacism, which is more concerned with who holds power. 65.92.53.132 10:36, 9 February 2006 (UTC)Pepe Reply If pressed, Taylor might also admit that Blacks are better basketball players. Therefore, trying to claim Jared Taylor is a white supremacist is both unproductive and demonstrably untrue. Taylor is very comfortable in acknowledging that Ashkenazi Jews (whom he considers white for all intents and purposes) and north Asians score higher on IQ tests than Anglo whites. I just wanted to note that while I personally disagree with many of the decidedly unrealistic and silly conclusions Taylor reaches (separation of the races within America, etc.) and find him to be a tad obnoxious at times, if you read his information at no point does he advocate or argue the supremacy of whites. The boy that picked flowers and made people laugh This article from a "progressive" website is the very definition of bias. It's just trying to demonise Taylor by associating him with figures it claims are 'neo-fascist' despite the fact that they explicity say they aren't (See British National Party/ Nick Griffin). The first link isn't really worth anyone's time to read. Cheers, - Willmcw 23:44, (UTC)ĭon't you think it's a little biased to have all those references to leftist "anti-racist" sites? One ought to suffice. Be bold, find some good sources, and add to this article. Better to describe actual things that he did or said which would allow the reader to make up their own mind about him. If we label him "disgusting" some might view that as expressing a POV without providing any information.
0 kommentar(er)
